This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Remove algo duplications

From: Daniel Krügler <daniel dot kruegler at googlemail dot com>
To: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:46:22 +0200
Subject: Re: Remove algo duplications
References: <4FD7A115.9060203@gmail.com> <4FE0D093.4020100@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1206201622200.5297@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>

2012/6/20 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>:
> (not a comment on your patch) did you have any opinion about the possibility
> to use indirect functors? I.e. functors that get called as f(i,j) instead of
> f(*i,*j), and f(a,b) typically returns *a<*b. I am not sure it is a good
> idea, but it might avoid any regression.

This looks like a very appealing approach to me. Basically similar to
iter_swap when iter_swap would have been a function object.

- Daniel

References:
- Remove algo duplications
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: Remove algo duplications
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: Remove algo duplications
  - From: Marc Glisse

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]