This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Ping][PATCH, libstdc++-v3] Enable to cross-test libstdc++ on simulator
- From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- Cc: Terry Guo <terry dot guo at arm dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, mikestump at comcast dot net, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:02:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Ping][PATCH, libstdc++-v3] Enable to cross-test libstdc++ on simulator
- References: <000001ccfc22$59706ed0$0c514c70$@guo@arm.com> <4F6C6F26.9010905@oracle.com>
Il 23/03/2012 13:40, Paolo Carlini ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/07/2012 06:22 AM, Terry Guo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can anybody please review and approve the following simple patch? Thanks
>> very much.
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-08/msg00063.html
> apparently somebody, somewhere, approved this patch, because I see:
>
> 2012-03-13 Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>
>
> * testsuite/Makefile.in (TEST_GCC_EXEC_PREFIX): New.
>
> but frankly the commit as-is didn't make much sense, because the *.in
> files are generated: a sensible patch should have touched the *.am file
> and then, upon approval, committed also the files change by 'autoreconf'.
It was approved by Mike Stump who obviously confused the *.in with *.am,
or libstdc++-v3 with gcc. It happens. :)
The same change done to Makefile.am is of course ok, but you don't need
my approval to install it.
(the other) Paolo