Re: "big" integer constants

[Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>]

On 10/29/2011 01:01 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Is sizeof(short) == sizeof(int) consistently on 16 bit targets?
> I don't know of any where sizeof(short) is less than 16 bits at least.
> I picked 65535U because it's a valid "big" number regardless of how
> big int/short/long are, as long as they're 16 bits or more.  I don't
> think gcc has any support for 8-bit "int" targets anywhere.
>
> At the very least, you know sizeof(int)>= sizeof(short) on all
> targets.
>
> > I'm actually working on TR29123 hopefully to get in before stage1
> > ends.
> Heh.  I'm trying to get a new port finished :-)
Sorry this took so long.  I got busy, then the holidays...

I just changed some big numbers to 
std::numeric_limits<std::tr1::uint16_t>::max().
No new testcases.  Everything works.
There may have been things beyond the range of the test cases I was 
trying to capture but I'm not going to work on that right now.

Ed

Attachment: CL_specfun_max_iter
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_specfun_max_iter
Description: Text document