This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:26:32 -0500
Subject: Re: RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131
References: <4DD69790.8070101@redhat.com> <BANLkTikt25ZT092x-zPkxJrJqvAGeHwSgg@mail.gmail.com> <4DD6AC75.8040202@redhat.com>

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 01:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>
>> Ah, I had always assumed that the previous implementation was exploiting
>> a license given by the standard which says that both contexts should
>> yield the same resolution, otherwise the program was ill-formed, no
>> diagnostic
>> required.
>
> I believe that only applies to multiple points of instantiation, not to the
> template definition context.

right you are.  Thanks,

-- Gaby

References:
- RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]