This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: cpu_defines.h not installed in freestanding C++ library. Bug or feature?

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: "Doug Kwan (éæå)" <dougkwan at google dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:32:56 +0100
Subject: Re: cpu_defines.h not installed in freestanding C++ library. Bug or feature?
References: <AANLkTi=PrknbasJ88zCQ2W6fS8iifTQbUp2qL5prFgc_@mail.gmail.com> <20110314104306.2b57cd5e@shotwell> <AANLkTinob2jms4XA9wFgiBkCjnY+iR7q8UWPsdsBM5GO@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/14/2011 06:54 PM, Doug Kwan (éæå) wrote:

It is obviously broken in the current state.  Is it okay to just add
cpu_defines.h in the rule install-freestanding-headers for now?  The
headers can be cleaned up after that.

Personally, I'm in favor of fixing this issue as soon as possible and also in the release branches, but, to be clear, the issue isn't new, right?

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cpu_defines.h not installed in freestanding C++ library. Bug or feature?
  - From: Doug Kwan (éæå)

References:
- cpu_defines.h not installed in freestanding C++ library. Bug or feature?
  - From: Doug Kwan (éæå)
- Re: cpu_defines.h not installed in freestanding C++ library. Bug or feature?
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: cpu_defines.h not installed in freestanding C++ library. Bug or feature?
  - From: Doug Kwan (éæå)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]