This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] fix libstdc++/45133
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 01:17:31 +0000
- Subject: Re: [v3] fix libstdc++/45133
- References: <AANLkTimymkPC6feQehVvXevT+in-qfQgT+Nw=6qWMOE9@mail.gmail.com>
On 14 December 2010 23:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This implements the behaviour encouraged by the new note on 30.6.6p3
> and 30.6.7p3 in the latest C++0x draft.
>
> 2010-12-14 ?Jonathan Wakely ?<jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?PR libstdc++/45133
> ? ? ? ?* include/std/future (__basic_future::wait): Throw if not valid.
> ? ? ? ?(__basic_future::wait_for): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?(__basic_future::wait_until): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?(__basic_future::_M_get_result): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?* testsuite/30_threads/future/members/45133.cc: New.
> ? ? ? ?* testsuite/30_threads/shared_future/members/45133.cc: New.
>
> tested x86_64-linux, checked in to trunk
One of the new tests failed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-12/msg01246.html
I'm looking into it ...