This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: c++0x tests fixes

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: François Dumont <francois dot cppdevs at free dot fr>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:48:23 +0000
Subject: Re: c++0x tests fixes
References: <4CF40FDF.7080201@free.fr> <4CF41EF0.7020103@oracle.com> <4CF6B71A.6000804@free.fr> <AANLkTimVjNYQND3axE_hgoKS-xrYuQt+oo5-qNQfBfvf@mail.gmail.com> <4CF804B4.90003@free.fr>

On 2 December 2010 20:42, François Dumont wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 11:16 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> I would have asked you to fix "explicitly" and "constructor" before
>> approving it for checkin, but I like the solution that avoids testing
>> for C++0x mode. ?Thanks for finding and fixing it.
>>
>
> Sorry, I will fix that next time I commit a patch.
>
> Maybe the attached one for the problem of deque/list/vector not being
> explicitly instantiatable with non default constructible types. Ok ?

Yes, that's ok to checkin - thanks very much.

References:
- Re: c++0x tests fixes
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: c++0x tests fixes
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: c++0x tests fixes
  - From: François Dumont

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]