This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: c++0x tests fixes

From: François Dumont <francois dot cppdevs at free dot fr>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:43:10 +0100
Subject: Re: c++0x tests fixes
References: <4CF40FDF.7080201@free.fr> <4CF41EF0.7020103@oracle.com> <AANLkTinR77K9FbnSUBU9-bSp1QyyA8EaB7Y3HMJU8VaN@mail.gmail.com> <4CF43F3C.5050200@oracle.com>

So I would simply propose to hide the explicit instantiation with a #ifndef __GLIBCXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__.

Ok ?

On 11/30/2010 01:03 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

On 11/30/2010 12:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

Whether it's overkill or not, I don't like the name - it's a feature
of C++0x, not the fact the implementation is experimental.

I agree, first blush I also didn't like the name. As I tried to say
already, I'm also a bit concerned that we may end up multiplying the
number of gates beyond control, but I don't have a very strong opinion.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: c++0x tests fixes
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]