This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] DR 1325 vs cons/2.cc

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:33:17 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFA] DR 1325 vs cons/2.cc
References: <4CB353BD.4040107@oracle.com> <AANLkTim5fY=NErFn+U_OcG0QK69rX1LKJgePZpyPO2Fk@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,
> Hmm, that test was pretty contrived - that particular code isn't
> necessarily realistic or required to work. It could be removed,
> however this change would still test the same thing, while allowing
> the template arguments to be deduced and call the new constructor:
>   
Excellent. The below is what I actually committed. Includes a much
better testcase -2.

Tested x86_64-linux.

Paolo.

//////////////////////

Attachment: CL_dr1325
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_dr1325_2
Description: Text document

References:
- [RFA] DR 1325 vs cons/2.cc
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFA] DR 1325 vs cons/2.cc
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]