This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: system_error::what

From: Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivascosta at gmail dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:06:30 +0200
Subject: Re: system_error::what
References: <AANLkTi=K2N8VwPAL2mnUhYMW8hP6ohuaAmc+RXWanCG5@mail.gmail.com> <4C57FCBD.6080103@oracle.com> <AANLkTimRM7q5HbZdLfTJpSKS5RMkTHCWPNuP==nBSMtb@mail.gmail.com> <4C581CFE.20805@oracle.com> <4C583428.2090201@oracle.com> <AANLkTikA2O+kiNCVBR3e4xZhJqDsu9yoo=3BNK_3RQhg@mail.gmail.com> <4C590AB2.7090302@oracle.com> <AANLkTikMjikVcxurt6TVXVOnXjPqkrWqpr5MHAuW065t@mail.gmail.com> <4C8FFDE8.1020207@oracle.com>

> I know, great, I see your patch for range based for loop is already in.
> By the way, the library bits should be already ok, please review, if you
> can.
Yes, I reviewed a while ago, and it seemed to me perfectly fine.
I've checked now the changes in the latest ISO draft and they are already there.

I'm attaching the patch updated to the current SVN revision, although
I think it is quite unchanged.

Regards.
Rodrigo.

Attachment: system_error.txt
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: system_error::what
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- Re: system_error::what
  - From: Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: system_error::what
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]