This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi,
No, there were AFAIR 22 failures, the same one with or without theOk, if you see only the synopsis.cc, the pb_ds (there are some latent
tests. Do you mean that I should undef _GLIBCXX_DEBUG when the test
don't work with it ? If so I could perhaps do so in an other patch
dedicated to fixing the debug-check target.
problems there), and the ext/profile failures, that's fine in
debug-mode. Actually, I should clean the ext/profile fails, in
particular profiler_algos.cc, which is new, nothing to do with your
work, anyway.
Really, with such a width indentation is not right in files I work on,- 80 columnsCertainly tabs are not forbidden, but the indentations must be right, 2
Sorry about that I looked for the number of chars and not the number of columns, because of tabulations it is not equal. By the way, are tabulations ok ? Most of projects I work on was forbidding tabs, should I consider that tabs are 8 spaces long ? To fix this problem I replace many __first, __last by respectively __f, __l, I hope it is fine.
chars wide each, essentially.
with width 8 it looks better.
Well, don't ask my opinion here: I'm so used to the GNU, and libstdc++ in particular, conventions, that *anything* else looks ugly to me ;)
Paolo
Attachment:
debug.patch
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |