This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Need Clarification about the Documentation License
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 23:43:02 +0100
- Subject: Re: Need Clarification about the Documentation License
- References: <4C339022.2010501@redhat.com>
Hi Jeff,
On 6 July 2010 21:20, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>
> If the binary is provided along with a plug-in as a data file (to avoid web
> access), does the entire plug-in instantly inherit the GPL V3 license?
>
> If no, what is the clause or clauses that specifies this?
You should probably send your question to the FSF at licensing@fsf.org
It's possible that the binary file would be covered by the GCC runtime
exception, so that the combination of the binary and your plugin (an
Independent Module) can be distributed under the terms of your plugin,
not the GPL. I really don't know if that applies, which is why you
should check with the FSF.
> If yes, is it possible to draft a use exception in the license?
I might be wrong, but I'd be very surprised if that happened.
Jonathan