This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: regex patch

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: stephen dot webb at bregmasoft dot ca
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:48:24 +0200
Subject: Re: regex patch
References: <201006181332.51474.stephenw.webb@bregmasoft.ca> <201006181542.07940.stephenw.webb@bregmasoft.ca>

On 06/18/2010 09:42 PM, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> Wait a minute... this abi_check failure is due to 220 added symbols, many of 
> them nothing to do with <regex>... stuff like std::future_error::what() 
> const.  Only 4 are marked as "incompatible," and they're new symbols being 
> added as well so I don't understand why they're incompatible.
>
> Would this constitute a regression?
>   
If abi_check fails is a regression. Full stop. It looks like something
is wrong with your setup, because abi_check doesn't fail for anybody
else, pre the <regex> patch, of course.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: regex patch
  - From: Stephen M. Webb
- Re: regex patch
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- regex patch
  - From: Stephen M. Webb
- Re: regex patch
  - From: Stephen M. Webb

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]