This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x

From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov at pdimov dot com>
To: "Paolo Carlini" <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov at pdimov dot com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Jason Merrill" <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 15:18:14 +0300
Subject: Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
References: <4BF50A18.20406@oracle.com> <4BF5188B.2070904@oracle.com> <4BF519F6.5010401@oracle.com> <157AF6E9B15B4C208668737AA2EA1DF3@pdimov5> <4BF52339.1080504@oracle.com> <4BF5240B.3050502@oracle.com>

On 05/20/2010 01:55 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
It's uglier because the code above doesn't work for functions,

By the way, do you have a specific testcase in mind?

Because addressof_fn_test.cpp, part of Boost, passes...

This is probably a g++/gcc extension... some compilers do not allow references to functions to be casted to char&, and I believe the standard doesn't permit that, either.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
  - From: Peter Dimov
- Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]