This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [fixincludes, v3] Enable full ISO C99 support for C++ on Solaris 10+

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro at cebitec dot uni-bielefeld dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Bruce Korb <bkorb at gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 18:42:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [fixincludes, v3] Enable full ISO C99 support for C++ on Solaris 10+
References: <ydd4oi6yxl4.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <AANLkTimWPtRlFyqRRfIf8GulgWZZajMjro3KAa6SZWzx@mail.gmail.com> <yddwrv1xw9e.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

On 18 May 2010 12:52, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> This leaves us with two real new failures (the tests didn't run before):
>>
>> Let me know if you want me to look at the <future> errors, I think I
>> wrote those tests.
>
> That would be great, especially given that my C++ knowledge is close to
> none :-)

The problem is I defined a "::wait" function which clashes with
wait(2).  The fix is to rename that function.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fixincludes, v3] Enable full ISO C99 support for C++ on Solaris 10+
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- [fixincludes, v3] Enable full ISO C99 support for C++ on Solaris 10+
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: [fixincludes, v3] Enable full ISO C99 support for C++ on Solaris 10+
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [fixincludes, v3] Enable full ISO C99 support for C++ on Solaris 10+
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]