This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [patch] Fix --enable-libstdcxx-time documentation, show configure result
- From: Miles Bader <miles at gnu dot org>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 10:13:46 +0900
- Subject: Re: [patch] Fix --enable-libstdcxx-time documentation, show configure result
- Connect(): No such file or directory
- References: <4BBA83C0.2030203@ubuntu.com> <4BBA87D9.4080906@oracle.com> <buovdbram65.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com> <buoy6g8p6wa.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com> <r2k4348dea51004280117i2e81bb08mf3063cab279d16ca@mail.gmail.com>
Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> writes:
> For native linux builds I think you are right and it has no downside,
> so distros could enable it by default.
>
> That still doesn't give a fully-conforming implementation though,, for
> that a monotonic clock is needed, which needs librt
> (enable-llibstdx-time=rt) and that definitely hass a downside as it
> makes libstdc++ depend on libpthread which turns on locking in libc.
So what's the right way to proceed on this?
I'm using debian, so I can forward this to the debian maintainers, and
ask them to enable these features in their builds, but it would be nice
to enable these features as widely as possible.
Thanks,
-Miles
--
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. [George Carlin]