This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: unique_ptr::get_deleter

From: Chris Fairles <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:16:34 -0500
Subject: Re: unique_ptr::get_deleter
References: <4348dea51003011343y10deba65m83c9dcf69c2d4190@mail.gmail.com> <4B8D1AA1.3020607@oracle.com>

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>> Does anyone remember why our unique_ptr::get_deleter is defined as
>>
>> typename std::add_lvalue_reference<deleter_type>::type
>> get_deleter();
>>
>> rather than the simpler:
>>
>> deleter_type&
>> get_deleter();
>>
> unless Chris replies something over the next day or so, I say let's
> clean up that, I don't see anything wrong with simply implementing the
> letter of the WD.
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo.
>

Can't think of any particular reason off the top of my head. If test
cases pass, giv'r.

Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: unique_ptr::get_deleter
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- unique_ptr::get_deleter
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: unique_ptr::get_deleter
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]