Re: [C++0x] Back to the <future>

[Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>]

2010/1/20 Paolo Carlini:
> On 01/21/2010 12:36 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> This patch updates <future> to match the n3000 working paper.
>>
> Great!
>> [snip interesting observations]
>>
>
>> Other changes are renaming unique_future to future, removing
>> future::is_ready, future::has_value and future::has_exception, but
>> adding future::valid, and adding some default constructors and move
>> operations. ?That obviously broke all the tests I spent ages writing
>> to check is_ready/has_value etc. :-) ?I haven't renamed the test
>> directory from unique_future to future.
>>
> That's puzzling: you mean as part of the patch, in order to keep the
> diff cleaner? Otherwise, with svn, renaming is such easy...


I thought I'd leave the renaming for a later checkin, so that this
commit will just show the
changes. I'll do that tomorrow.

>> Tested x86_64/Linux. ?This only affects C++0x mode so I'd like to
>> commit it for 4.5, fixing libstdc++/42201
>>
> In case you need the vote of a second maintainer, you have mine ;)

It's in now.