This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: libstdc++/21772 part 3
- From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:30:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/21772 part 3
- References: <20091215214406.2a2f5348@mcgee.artheist.org> <20091217012815.392cbeff@mcgee.artheist.org> <20091231200031.773295ed@redhat.com> <4B3DCD38.2020800@oracle.com>
On 01/01/2010 11:23 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Ok, thanks. As a follow-up, I have removed, for now at least, the
> basic_string (and vstring, which still follows the same specifications)
> tests, because we can't instantiate for non-POD (per 21/1).
>
Turns out I was missing that we are testing *only* in C++0x mode. I have
re-added the tests, sorry. Still, to be honest, I think we are pretty
sloppy in making sure we are instantiating with types strictly of
literal type only, actually, I'm pretty sure we aren't. But we can fix that.
Paolo.