This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New const char* ctor for C++-0x

2009/12/23 Ed Smith-Rowland:
> + ?const char * str01 = "010101000011";
> + ?std::bitset<n1> bit01(str01);

Wouldn't this have passed anyway, without the new constructor?  I
believe the point of the new constructor is to avoid the overhead of
creating a std::string, but this test doesn't verify that.
How about a type with a conversion to char* so that it would take too
many conversions to go via the std::string constructor?
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]