Re: Version script vs. mangled names on systems where size_type != unsigned int

[Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>]

On 12/17/2009 03:17 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> I really can't see any sensible place to do that; there's absolutely
> nothing
> documenting what any of the other parts and sub-parts of patterns mean and if
> I'm describing 'x' and 'y' it's going to be by contrasting them with 'i' and
> 'j' ... which also aren't described anywhere.  If you have a good suggestion,
> I'll run with it when I commit, but otherwise I think I'd rather just let the
> changelog speak for itself.
>   
Actually we *should* have something documenting the patterns, patches
welcome ;)

For now, just one line right before the first occurrence (and saying
"... and below") will do.

Thanks,
Paolo.