This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Some extra decorations

From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:05:34 +0200
Subject: Re: Some extra decorations
References: <20090503162856.GA14670@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <4348dea50905030946k73314472s50366179a4dd3e47@mail.gmail.com> <20090503164833.GC8120@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <49FDCC59.1090609@oracle.com>

> Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > If it is only for testing purposes, why it gets installed along with
> > other libstdc++ headers?
> >   
> Right. All the allocators in ext in principle can be also used everywhere.
> >> The throw_allocator members should be declared inline.
> >>     
> > Seems so :) Or they should go into some CC file linked into libstdc++
> > testsuite.
> >   
> Some are large, thus not suitable to be declared inline as they are.
So if I get it right, the proper fix would be to move stuff into
libstdc++ and regenerat the ABI symbol lists, right?

Honza
> 
> Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some extra decorations
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- Some extra decorations
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Some extra decorations
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Some extra decorations
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Some extra decorations
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]