This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] c++0x <system_error> CD updates

From: "Chris Fairles" <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>
To: "Paolo Carlini" <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "Gcc Patch List" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:02:02 -0400
Subject: Re: [v3] c++0x <system_error> CD updates
References: <fac6bb500810140609v526adfc5h4510da830910bd15@mail.gmail.com> <48F49CBA.9030004@oracle.com> <fac6bb500810150822o79548a1dv5e01a412e366e589@mail.gmail.com> <48F60E44.5060507@oracle.com>

> Can't we export the statics from the .so, as usual in such cases?

Turns out there's a DR related to this (LWG, DR 890). The suggested
solution is to get rid of the get_* functions and leave the storage
specifier impl. defined. Its still "Open" but have a strong feeling
that it will be resolved somehow, if not with the current suggested
solution.

Going to give it a whirl.

Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] c++0x <system_error> CD updates
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [v3] c++0x <system_error> CD updates
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [v3] c++0x <system_error> CD updates
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] c++0x <system_error> CD updates
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [v3] c++0x <system_error> CD updates
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]