This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix libstdc++/36962

From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov at mmltd dot net>
To: "Paolo Carlini" <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, "Jonathan Wakely" <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Chris Fairles" <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:15:01 +0300
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix libstdc++/36962
References: <4348dea50809041513n77358d9waee2196254036b56@mail.gmail.com> <fac6bb500809041527k6e8e6636ncdd142c34cf6834a@mail.gmail.com> <48C0624D.2030409@oracle.com> <4348dea50809041538s314739e4se0001ba20b2eba4b@mail.gmail.com> <48C10474.7010401@oracle.com>

--- 394,400 ---- _S_create_from_up(std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Del>&& __r, typename std::enable_if<std::is_reference<_Del>::value>::type* = 0) { ! return new _Sp_counted_deleter<_Tp*, _Del, std::allocator<_Tp>, _Lp>(__r.get(), std::ref(__r.get_deleter())); }

Interesting observation.

I think that the difference is detectable with get_deleter though.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Fix libstdc++/36962
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [patch] Fix libstdc++/36962
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [patch] Fix libstdc++/36962
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [patch] Fix libstdc++/36962
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [patch] Fix libstdc++/36962
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [patch] Fix libstdc++/36962
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]