This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Do we care about binary compatibility of code produced by cross-compilers?


Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I don't think it's worth worrying about the fact that the tests are
run multiple times. If you want to speed up configury, help get Tom's
quagmire project working for gcc (http://code.google.com/p/quagmire/).
Interesting, I'll have a look.

To be clear, I was not talking *performance*. I was surprised that we were running exactly the same test 4 times, with the same outcome, of course. Sure, if those libraries are meant to be built separately, aren't really meant to be just "helpers" for GCC, that makes a lot of sense. But is that really true? For what is worth, as regards libstdc++-v, which I can say to know, history included, I can say we definitely moved away from the idea of delivering a self-consistent, closed, library. We are totally relying on GCC as C++ compiler, not just that, the exact GCC built in the tree. Thus, as far as v3 is concerned, it would be totally ok to "get from somewhere" the outcome of GCC_CHECK_TLS and just use it.

Paolo.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]