This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Undefined ref to 'function<void ()()>::operator()() const' when called from free function defined in cc file.

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Chris Fairles <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:56:07 +0200
Subject: Re: Undefined ref to 'function<void ()()>::operator()() const' when called from free function defined in cc file.
References: <fac6bb500808290541nf3184adr7bdc6b06a1673d7a@mail.gmail.com> <48B7F38A.6040400@oracle.com> <fac6bb500808290614v64908881se1793eef1a1c80e0@mail.gmail.com>

Chris Fairles wrote:

(PS. by tomorrow I should be ready to submit patches for at least <mutex> and <condition_variable> w/ testacse, changlogs etc. I do have a working <thread> too but w/o proper test cases so it will probably be a separate submission after mutex and condition_variable).

That's just *great*, but take your time, nothing important changes if we have the patch one week later...

By the way, about the famous issue of variadic templates vs initializer_list for min and max, there is a new paper out, rather nice: n2722. I feel that indeed something will happen in San Francisco...

Paolo.

References:
- Undefined ref to 'function<void ()()>::operator()() const' when called from free function defined in cc file.
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: Undefined ref to 'function<void ()()>::operator()() const' when called from free function defined in cc file.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Undefined ref to 'function<void ()()>::operator()() const' when called from free function defined in cc file.
  - From: Chris Fairles

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]