This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Missing const_pointer in TR1 unordered_map/unordered_set

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: John Maddock <john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:01:39 +0200
Subject: Re: Missing const_pointer in TR1 unordered_map/unordered_set
References: <fac6bb500808181334g20d7f748r471bd6825979a337@mail.gmail.com> <48A9E68A.8070101@oracle.com> <48A9E969.8020700@oracle.com> <48A9EB71.4020106@oracle.com> <fac6bb500808181456l46aef0dh26a75e2403f7ed25@mail.gmail.com> <48A9F160.8040803@oracle.com> <fac6bb500808190410u2565d2e1l5ca7209a4a424e5f@mail.gmail.com> <48B58114.104@codesourcery.com> <68A65B3A25974545864D8D79890312C1@fuji>

John Maddock wrote:

The title says it all really, the TR1 versions of the unordered associative containers lack a "const_pointer" typedef in gcc-4.3.

You are right, I'll fix that.

Thanks,
Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Missing TR1 cmath functions
  - From: John Maddock
- Re: Missing const_pointer in TR1 unordered_map/unordered_set
  - From: John Maddock
- std::complex overloads in wrong namespace?
  - From: John Maddock

References:
- [PATCH] posix gthreads additions for c++0x thread library
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [PATCH] posix gthreads additions for c++0x thread library
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [PATCH] posix gthreads additions for c++0x thread library
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [PATCH] posix gthreads additions for c++0x thread library
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Missing const_pointer in TR1 unordered_map/unordered_set
  - From: John Maddock

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]