This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Formatting, tabs vs spaces.

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Rodolfo Lima <rodolfo at rodsoft dot org>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:09:56 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: Formatting, tabs vs spaces.
Accept-language: en-US
References: <fac6bb500807160428q18f93b41k3280940646dd132a@mail.gmail.com> <fac6bb500807160433k60de2697sf58fe865f8a078cc@mail.gmail.com> <12907503.1216208538694.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt304.oracle.com> <g5ko0c$mjn$1@ger.gmane.org>

> Or, if you're like me and don't want a full-blown lisp interpreter
> hanging around loaded in memory ( :) ), just stick with vi

To be clear: I didn't mean to suggest *changing* tools, only considering Emacs as a reference for configuring the others. For better and worse, it's the reference for the GNU projects, nobody knowing a bit of computer science history can seriously disagree.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Formatting, tabs vs spaces.
  - From: Rodolfo Lima

References:
- Formatting, tabs vs spaces.
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: Formatting, tabs vs spaces.
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: Formatting, tabs vs spaces.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Formatting, tabs vs spaces.
  - From: Rodolfo Lima

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]