This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Arithmetic type emulator helper class for testcases.


On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Paolo Carlini
<paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> ... maybe my last message wasn't sufficiently clear. I meant: let's have *first* a minimal <chrono> sufficient to replace <date_time> for the current uses, and commit it first, together with the adjustments to the current users, together with the <date_time> removal.
>
> Paolo.
>
>

Hold up. My brain isn't working at 100% capacity today :) I need
clarification. You're suggesting we basically "cut and paste" the
current <date_time> into <chrono> verbatim and change all date_time
references to chrono so that <mutex> and <condition_variable> (and
whatever else uses date_time) are happy even though the contents of
<date_time> don't conform to anything in <chrono> according to the WD
(and aren't even close)? And at the same time, we remove <date_time>
leaving us with a non-compliant but minimal <chrono>, but everything
else is happy. Then (another patch) we update chrono, mutex and
condition_variable together to the current WD?

If by "minimal <chrono>" you mean a minimal *conforming* <chrono> (to
current WD) then it pretty much needs everything since system_time
uses time_points and durations so I assume you mean the above?

Thanks,
Chris


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]