This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFH: Symbol versions for __aeabi symbols

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:41:14 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: RFH: Symbol versions for __aeabi symbols
Accept-language: en-US
References: <48727C24.1080704@codesourcery.com> <15718095.1215515155682.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt301.oracle.com> <48738E1B.1030802@codesourcery.com> <20080709175551.03f6a81b@balbo.artheist.org>

> This has been done in the past by using port_specific_symbol_files,
> say adding a
> 
> config/cpu/arm/arm-extra.ver
> 
> file with the new symbols in CXXABI_ARM_1.3.
> 
> I would suggest re-using this approach, or some close variant.
> 
> This has the advantage of being a similar approach to the one
> used for the CXXABI_LDBL_1.3 exports used on some arches (powerpc/sparc/s390)
> for long double changes.

Ah! Thanks for reminding this, Benjamin!

Paolo.

References:
- RFH: Symbol versions for __aeabi symbols
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFH: Symbol versions for __aeabi symbols
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: RFH: Symbol versions for __aeabi symbols
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFH: Symbol versions for __aeabi symbols
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]