This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Removal of pre-ISO C++ items from include/backwards


On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 19:41 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/10/2007, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> > This would not be correct. When you deprecate C++2000 features,
> > you should retain them in such a way that a compiler switch
> > such as --std=C++2000 will ensure they're visible in the usual way.
> 
> So this doesn't go unchallenged and give people reading the archives
> the wrong idea: that's exactly what Benjamin proposed. 

I agree, I read that subsequently and the detailed deprecation plan
seems very good to me.. this is a case where access to the 'archive
variable' from two 'threads' was 'unordered' .. :)

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]