Re: [Patch] Use variadic templates for tr1::is_function

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Doug Gregor wrote:

> On Apr 10, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> > I'm finishing regtesting the below, which I consider better than  
> > instantiating a lot of templates for a single trait and/or using  
> > something like the old __in_array. Do you agree?
>
> Yes, and your improved version (which removes cv-qualifiers) is the  
> right way to go.

Thanks.

> It was an oversight. As you know, just adding the following will fix  
> this error:
>
> > template<typename _Res, typename... _ArgTypes>
> >    struct _Weak_result_type_impl<_Res(_ArgTypes......)>
> >    {
> >      typedef _Res result_type;
> >    };
>
> Sure, you can put a comma between the two ellipses, but it's much  
> more amusing to type six periods in a row :)

Definitely ;) didn't know about that syntax.

Then, seriously, I will prepare a patch,

Paolo.