This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PODs vs memset

From: gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:38:58 -0500
Subject: Re: PODs vs memset
References: <4612DD38.3020204@suse.de> <87fy7hf2n5.fsf@soliton.cs.tamu.edu> <4613EA6C.30202@suse.de> <4613EDB5.3090509@suse.de>

Quoting Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>:

... restricting now the attention to "scalars" (i.e., what our library __is_scalar implements, no member pointers), I still think it makes sense to use memset elsewhere too, not only in valarray...

I'm fine with that as long as we don't get C4x people mad at us. :-)

Paolo.

References:
- PODs vs memset
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: PODs vs memset
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: PODs vs memset
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: PODs vs memset
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]