This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C99 _Complex and C++ complex<> interoperability.


On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Howard Hinnant wrote:

| On Feb 25, 2007, at 8:41 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > | Fwiw here are some relevant links:
| > |
| > | http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#387
| > |
| > | The above link is a C++ committee library working group defect
| > report
| > | on this subject.  It is in an open state meaning that no decision
| > has
| > | been made.
| >
| > I'm flagabasted by the astonding efficiency of LWG for an issue
| >
| >   http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2002/n1388.pdf
| >
| > that was discussed in more than LWG committee during the Santa Cruz
| > meeting (October 22-25, 2002),  resolution adopted in "Review" state
| > as reported by the Santa Cruz post mailing.
|
| Thank you for your kind words regarding the efforts of those people
| who make the extra effort to attend the LWG meetings (both official
| and unofficial) and cope with the extraordinary workload, all on a
| volunteer basis.

Since that issue was raised, I volunteered my time, making extra effort
to attend all meetings (except Sydney) (both official and unofficial)
and cope with the extraordinary workload.  I suspect the progress
from "review state" for at least three meetings to "open status" must be
explained by extraodinary events or dedication.  And I respectfully
applaud that.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]