Re: AVL vs Red-Black tree

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Daniel K. O. wrote:

> Well, no response after a week. 

Please be patient, thanks. There are lots of issues here. First, you 
should include a pointer to the discussion on comp.lang.c++.moderated 
coming to the conclusion that AVL trees are 100% ok from the conformance 
point of view (in case, detail why your specific version is). Second, 
you should know that this kind of large, ABI-breaking change, can only 
be suited for the next ABI, so-called v7, thus no hurry for current GCC 
mainline, where we are staying with 6.x. Last but not least, from a 
legal point of view, before the GCC project can even think accepting 
large contributions, a copyright assignment must be on file: since you 
are willing (many thanks, of course!) to help, I would suggest starting 
on the procedure as soon as possible:

   http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html

In short, you should ask assignments@gnu.org your request.

Thanks for now,
Paolo.