This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 15 Jan 2007 10:24:40 -0600
Subject: Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701142156560.4862@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <45AA9E97.5070200@suse.de> <6c33472e0701141448t7582f53ejf05bc82fd8754760@mail.gmail.com> <45AAB7B3.5000606@suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701150045090.7993@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <45AACA53.9050702@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

[...]

| Let's wait a bit more for other opinions, say one day or two, then I
| will start the actual work. As far as I can see, other compilers do
| not warn in such cases, and adding casts (*) isn't the cleanest
| practice in the world, thus my caution...

I agree.  The casts will just paper over the problem, without solving it.

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]