Re: TR1 Math tarball

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

> I have full confidence that refinements and work on Paolo's other
> issues will proceed once this is checked in. Paolo, are you willing to
> move to a more incremental style for this work?
>  
Certainly. We completely (someone would say "violently", but I don't 
like violence, also in methphorical sense ;) agree on the general 
philosophy. My pointe were, essentially: 1- We want to make sure that 
the initial code at least *compiles* on many platforms (see the 
std::tr1::cmath issue), 2- Frankly, even if we are talking about a good 
starting point, not the complete work, we would like to avoid blatant 
problems in code that we are making available to everyone, not only the 
developers (once more (I said that already), even if that still seems 
weird to me, people brwose the source code of the library while 
*learning to program in C++* )

Anyway, I plan to post a few additional comments later today, then, when 
cleared  at least point 1- above, in one additional iteration in other 
terms, I agree that we can commit to svn.

Paolo.