This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] libstdc++/29989

From: Doug Gregor <dgregor at cs dot indiana dot edu>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>, Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 12:58:33 -0500
Subject: Re: [Patch] libstdc++/29989
References: <4571E7A4.8060008@suse.de> <20061204173953.GK21441@synopsys.com> <45745E9E.1020402@suse.de> <m3y7pn4ksb.fsf@zeus.integrable-solutions.net>

On Dec 4, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

I seem to remember this was done because some platforms defined min
and max as macros; I can't remember from the top of my head.  They are
reserved names anyway, so we *can* #undef them with no harm, and I
see no pressure in removing the #undefs.

<windows.h> is known to #define min and max as macros.

	Cheers,
	Doug

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch] libstdc++/29989
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [Patch] libstdc++/29989
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] libstdc++/29989
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: [Patch] libstdc++/29989
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] libstdc++/29989
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]