This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Search algorithms in __gnu_cxx::

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Dhruv Matani <dhruvbird at gmail dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:59:49 +0100
Subject: Re: Search algorithms in __gnu_cxx::
References: <3a9148b90609061012i22cb2aa3led317334ebbac0a3@mail.gmail.com> <4509C317.2050208@suse.de> <3a9148b90609150009v1595c80oe753a6d68d15b36e@mail.gmail.com> <450A5AA1.2070901@suse.de> <3a9148b90609150440p75effeb0v69cc967d02af79be@mail.gmail.com> <450A931B.7070105@suse.de> <3a9148b90609180239m7c9e242en99757573133f2bad@mail.gmail.com> <450E6FD0.1090501@suse.de> <3a9148b90611130154t477f75d6h3e7cf9c218275f0@mail.gmail.com> <4558442C.1010900@suse.de> <3a9148b90611130215x29cdcabcmfc8a768eff4aaee8@mail.gmail.com>

Dhruv Matani wrote:

IMHO, these were right up there along with the issue of using/sprucing
up the glibc strstr. Another issue was wide string support. IIRC, both
were resolved amicably.

To be sure, no doubt about the "amicability" ;) I meant, after so *many* weeks, I'm afraid we can't really start again from the last public message and disregard all the various details which surfaced in private email: in other terms, I'm still waiting for your replies ;) At least, please allow me a bit of time to refocus my mind...

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Search algorithms in __gnu_cxx::
  - From: Dhruv Matani

References:
- Re: Search algorithms in __gnu_cxx::
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: Search algorithms in __gnu_cxx::
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Search algorithms in __gnu_cxx::
  - From: Dhruv Matani

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]