This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Re: [C++ PATCH] C++0x static assertions
- From: "Doug Gregor" <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
- To: "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 22:17:39 -0500
- Subject: Re: Re: [C++ PATCH] C++0x static assertions
- References: <C65FB780-CA0C-4D86-8979-5B47551F4826@cs.indiana.edu> <m38ximc20b.fsf@zeus.integrable-solutions.net>
On 07 Nov 2006 23:42:28 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis
<gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com> writes:
could we simplify the ugliness and do without __static_assert, and
plain static_assert?
If we don't care to use static_assert inside libstdc++ (or we want to
fall back to library-only solutions when we're not in C++0x mode),
yes, we can simplify. I'm CC'ing libstdc++; if anyone wants to use
static_assert in the library, they should speak up :)
[...]
| 2006-11-07 Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com>
Don't we need the corresponding pretty-printing?
I always forget the pretty-printing. I'll add it.
Cheers,
Doug