This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Optimzed vs. readable code

From: Pierre THIERRY <nowhere dot man at levallois dot eu dot org>
To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
Cc: caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:19:44 +0100
Subject: Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
References: <pan.2005.11.29.16.48.37.733665@levallois.eu.org> <F2B5F487-EF4D-43E4-B2D2-AD7EA914F24F@apple.com> <pan.2005.11.29.22.27.59.180878@levallois.eu.org> <57767.83.70.108.191.1133369588.squirrel@www.cs.york.ac.uk> <20051130171444.GC18129@bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org> <20051130173125.GA15874@synopsys.com>

Scribit Joe Buck dies 30/11/2005 hora 09:31:
> Then gcc is not a decent compiler.  Actually, I suspect that no
> conforming C++ compiler is allowed to be "decent" in the general case

OK, so I may be wrong in my expectations, in fact...

Negatively,
Nowhere man
-- 
nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]