This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures]
- From: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>
- To: Karel Gardas <kgardas at objectsecurity dot com>
- Cc: Christian Joensson <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>,Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:21:48 +0100
- Subject: Re: libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures]
- References: <5460e333050711235450ecfac2@mail.gmail.com> <200507120932.16709.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <5460e3330507120047690eb80@mail.gmail.com> <5460e3330507120320644666bc@mail.gmail.com> <20050712105715.GA60725@compsoc.man.ac.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507121308270.2526@silence.gardas.net> <20050712114511.GA61562@compsoc.man.ac.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507121350010.2526@silence.gardas.net>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:55:11PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> >>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>
> >>>The minimum binutils for libstdc++ is now 2.15.90.0.1.1, I don't know
> >>>about the rest of GCC.
> >>
> >>does this also apply to other than sparc platforms? I'm cunfused by your
> >
> >I believe that version applies to x86 linux and x86-64 linux. I don't
> >know about Sparc linux. The only hard fact I can confirm first-hand is
> >that the latest binutils from FC3 updates works for me on x86_64.
>
> Interesting! Please have a look at:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00602.html
>
> those are test results from 4.0.1 release compiled on debian 3.1/AMD64
> (pure64 bit). This debian is using binutils 2.15:
[snip]
> and IMHO testresults look quite good except abi_check, don't they? i.e. do
> you mean updating binutils will resolve abi_check issue in libstdc++
> testsuite?
I'd assume yes, based on Benjamin's statement here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-06/msg00132.html
But I don't know what's really causing the abi_check failure.
I've CC'd the libstdc++ list so I hope one of the v3 guys will be able
to answer that for you.
jon