This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch] libstdc++/21244
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>| Certainly, when complex arithmetic is
>| involved we are going to uglify a lot the code, sigh.
>
>I think I do not understand this part. Could you elaborate?
>
>
In the patch I'm working on, there are instances of ""complex""
arithmetic involving the anonymous enums values, example from stl_bvector.h:
_Bit_type*
_M_allocate(size_t __n)
{ return _M_impl.allocate((__n + _S_word_bit - 1) / _S_word_bit); }
If I'm not mistaken, since any operator could be potentially overloaded,
we must change it to this:
_Bit_type*
_M_allocate(size_t __n)
{ return _M_impl.allocate((__n + int(_S_word_bit) - 1) /
int(_S_word_bit)); }
Agreed?
(actually, the above is the worst case ;)
Paolo.