This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [libstdc++ PATH] tr1::bind support
> One
> "minor" difference between the libstdc++ and Boost implementations of
> bind and mem_fn is that libstdc++ uses a single class template (e.g.,
> _Bind) with lots of partial specializations whereas Boost uses many
> more class templates with the number of parameters attached (bind0,
> bind1, bind2, ..., etc.). We could try going the Boost way to see if
> that improves compile time.
For what it's worth, I prefer the partial specialization approach. I think it
much more elegant: nice stylish job.
Wouldn't adding the tr1 headers to the pch file give us a bigger boost?
Chris seemed to indicate this, at least, in a prior message. I'm in
favor of that.
-benjamin