This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++ PATH] tr1::bind support

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Chris Jefferson <caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Douglas Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:20:00 +0100
Subject: Re: [libstdc++ PATH] tr1::bind support
References: <200503201556.53335.doug.gregor@gmail.com> <423F5F03.1080002@cs.york.ac.uk> <fc6c49502785f962caa82170a4f53f7f@cs.indiana.edu> <423FED15.4010702@cs.york.ac.uk>

Chris Jefferson wrote:

I tried preprosessing, which produced a 3.9M file.. it still takes >20 seconds to compile. However, once I pursaded pre-compiled headers to work, while the resulting files was 52M(!!) now it compiles in < 1 sec, so when/if everyone is using precompiled headers, the problem will be allieviated somewhat. I still think it might be nice to pull the functional header apart a bit...

Yes, I think Doug already figured out how (that common header)...

In my opinion, Doug and Chris, you should keep in touch and help each other finalizing bind and tuple: both the open issues (i.e., compile time performance, unnecessary workaround for 10 parameters) seem easily solvable in that context.

Thanks!
Paolo.

References:
- [libstdc++ PATH] tr1::bind support
  - From: Douglas Gregor
- Re: [libstdc++ PATH] tr1::bind support
  - From: Chris Jefferson
- Re: [libstdc++ PATH] tr1::bind support
  - From: Douglas Gregor
- Re: [libstdc++ PATH] tr1::bind support
  - From: Chris Jefferson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]