This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: One version number, take three

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:30:27 -0800
Subject: Re: One version number, take three
References: <1110439201.7468.10.camel@localhost.localdomain><20050310111624.4b97bbca@belmont.artheist.org>

Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

>> 1) There is no longer a copy of the datestamp in 
>> libstdc++-v3/include/bits/c++config
>
> This part looks fine. 
>
> If you continue to update DATESTAMP on the release branches, then this
> is a complete replacement for current libstdc++ behavior and everything
> is cool.

Yes, DATESTAMP will continue to be updated on release branches that
contain it.

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: One version number, take three
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- One version number, take three
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: One version number, take three
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]