This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

Thanks for verifying that the macro is never set. I however have a
question:

[...]

| //////////////////////
| 2005-01-26 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
| | * acinclude.m4 ([GLIBCXX_ENABLE_C99]): Add ac_c99_complex
| in the final test for enable_c99, thus robustifying it; remove
| duplicate final test on ac_99_math.
| * configure: Regenerate.

How is that related to the below?

| * include/std/std_complex.h: Remove usages of the dead
| _GLIBCXX_BUGGY_COMPLEX macro.


Completely, absolutely unrelated: I tried to clarify this adding blank lines
in the ChangeLog. If you agree with the substance, I can use three separate
ChangeLogs...

Paolo.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]