Re: [patch] Remove invalid test on non-const empty strings

[Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>]

On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:49:50AM +0000, Chris Jefferson wrote:

> If adding overloads to std is valid however then really the test / code 
> needs fixing anyway, as you say, as this is something which can legally 
> be done. I am somewhat suprised people are allowed to add overloads 
> here, but if thats what the standard says, so be it!

As I said:
> >They're specialisations, not overloads, so are absolutely fine.

Otherwise you couldn't specialise std::iterator_traits, for instance.

jon

-- 
"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to
 change that here and there."
	- Feynman