Re: [rfc] fix libstdc++/10606

[Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>]

Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:09:02PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> > I'm forwarding below some comments that Martin (PR submitter and
> > author of the relevant DR) sent me privately:
> >
> > "From the data array it seems that Richard chose to implement a slightly
> > different behavior than what's being proposed in issue 475:
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#475
> > According to bullet (4) of the proposed resolution, data[1] in the
> > test program should be { 1, 0, true }. I.e., uncaught_exception()
> > should return true immediately after completing the evaluation of
> > the operand of throw.
>
>
> If that's the semantics we want, I suppose it would be possible to
> increment the unhandled exception count in __cxa_allocate_exception.
>
> It would make me feel better if this were'nt an open DR though.

Me too -- but your change is clearly an improvement over the current 
state.  I guess I'd only be concerned if you thought it was going to be 
impossible to implement the likely outcome of the DR without adding yet 
another API function.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304