This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: weak for Darwin

From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
To: "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org,Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:51:58 -0800
Subject: Re: weak for Darwin
References: <20041026060731.4F9AE1B4B330@geoffk5.apple.com> <418454B8.1000905@aaronwl.com> <m2d5yyxgup.fsf@greed.local> <41868CB1.3070801@aaronwl.com> <1269AB22-2C45-11D9-96C5-000A95B1F520@geoffk.org> <4186AC9D.9020007@aaronwl.com> <759C340C-2C7D-11D9-9C8B-000A95B1F520@geoffk.org> <41870EDF.4040406@aaronwl.com> <20041101225614.728199ba.bkoz@redhat.com> <4188367F.3020003@aaronwl.com>

On 02/11/2004, at 5:38 PM, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

This is the right idea, however the default should be to do nothing, and config/os/darwin/os_defines.h should define _GLIBCXX_WEAK_DEFINITION to do the special stuff.
OK.  What do you think about this?  Geoffrey, does the comment in
config/os/bsd/darwin/os_defined.h say the right thing?

Yes, this sounds right.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

References:
- Re: weak for Darwin
  - From: Geoffrey Keating
- Re: weak for Darwin
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise
- Re: weak for Darwin
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: weak for Darwin
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise
- Re: weak for Darwin
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: weak for Darwin
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise
- Re: weak for Darwin
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: weak for Darwin
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]